Frank Kendall III criticizes Pete Hegseth for politicizing military service
Former Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall III criticized Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for politicizing the military, stating he “couldn’t serve” in the Trump administration due to this issue. Kendal…
Former Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall III stated on Sunday that he “couldn’t serve” in the Trump administration, criticizing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for allegedly politicizing the military. During an appearance on ABC’s “This Week,” Kendall expressed his disapproval of Hegseth’s approach to leadership at the Pentagon, saying, “I’ve never seen an attempt to politicize our military like the one being conducted by Pete Hegseth.”
Kendall's remarks come amid ongoing debates about the role of the military in American politics. The Trump administration faced significant scrutiny over its handling of military affairs, including the controversial deployment of active-duty troops to quell protests in 2020. Kendall’s comments reflect a broader concern among military leaders about maintaining the integrity and apolitical nature of the armed forces, which is seen as crucial for national security and public trust.
Hegseth, a former Fox News personality and strong supporter of Trump, has been a polarizing figure. Critics argue that his ties to right-wing media and rhetoric may undermine the military's traditional role as a non-partisan institution. Kendall’s criticism adds to a growing chorus of voices from both current and former military officials who worry that political motivations might interfere with military readiness and operations.
Looking ahead, Kendall’s comments may influence ongoing discussions about military leadership and its relationship with political figures. As the country approaches the 2024 presidential election, the issue of military politicization could become a focal point for candidates. The military's role in political matters will likely be scrutinized further, as leaders like Kendall advocate for a return to a more traditional separation between military and political spheres. This debate will be crucial in shaping future policies and the public’s perception of the armed forces.
Read Full Story at The Hill →


