Congress criticizes Trumpโs order lifting sanctions on Russia
Congress sharply criticized President Trump's executive order lifting sanctions on Russia, arguing it undermines U.S. support for Ukraine and violates bipartisan legislation. The decision, framed as โฆ
Congress members on Thursday blasted President Donald Trumpโs executive order that lifts sweeping economic sanctions on Russia, saying the move undermines U.S. support for Ukraine and contradicts a bipartisan sanctions law passed last year. The order, signed late Friday, removes the restrictions that had barred most trade and financial activity with Moscow and was announced after Trump sealed a dieselโfuel deal with the Russian government.
The exemption comes amid a surge of Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian cities, including Moscow and St.โฏPetersburg, and a heated domestic debate over rising energy costs. Trump has framed the waiver as a nationalโsecurity measure aimed at curbing diesel prices that are topping votersโ concerns in the final stretch of the 2024 midterm elections. Analysts at the International Energy Agency, however, warned that the diesel sale is unlikely to dent global fuel prices, and that the sanctions relief is more about political signaling than economic impact.
Democratic and Republican lawmakers alike expressed alarm. Several members cited the original sanctions bill, which explicitly gave the president the authority to temporarily waive sanctions only in emergencies, arguing that Trumpโs justification does not meet that threshold. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, speaking on โMeet the Press,โ called the exemption a โhistoric mistakeโ and a โtragedyโ that could embolden Russiaโs war effort. The White House, for its part, claimed that Russian energy attacks on Ukraine are driving fuel costs higher, and that easing sanctions is the only lever left to protect American consumers.
The next steps are unclear. Critics say Congress may seek to reinstate the sanctions through new legislation or a vote to overturn the waiver, while the administration appears prepared to defend the order as a temporary measure tied to energy security. The dispute highlights the broader clash between foreignโpolicy objectives and domestic political pressures as the United States heads toward the November elections.
Read Full Story at NPR Politics โ


