Beyer files resolution to halt Trump’s $200 million arch
Rep. Don Beyer reports construction vehicles have arrived for Trump’s 200-foot arch near the Washington Monument. Beyer is filing a resolution to halt the $200 million project, which faces legal and …
Rep. Don Beyer (D‑VA) said on Thursday that President Trump is moving forward with the construction of his controversial arch just outside Washington, D.C. Beyer visited the site after constituents told him that construction vehicles had arrived. The arch, which Trump has promoted as a monument to his presidency, would be built near the Washington Monument and would stand 200 feet tall.
The arch has been a point of contention for years. Trump has promised a $200‑million structure that would echo the grandeur of the Lincoln Memorial. Critics argue it would be a waste of taxpayer money and an unnecessary addition to the National Mall. The project has stalled in the past because of opposition from lawmakers, the National Park Service, and the public. The arch would be a permanent symbol of Trump’s legacy, but many see it as a political stunt.
Beyer said he is alarmed by the speed of the project. He said the arrival of trucks is a clear sign that Trump is ignoring the public’s concerns. “It’s a blatant disregard for the public trust,” Beyer said. He will file a resolution to halt construction and call for an independent review of the project. Beyer is on the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, which has the power to block the arch. He also plans to ask for a hearing to hear from the public and experts.
The next steps for the arch are uncertain. The project still needs congressional approval and would face legal challenges from environmental groups and the National Park Service. Trump can use his influence to push the project forward, but the opposition is likely to file a lawsuit. If the arch is approved, construction could begin next year. If not, the project could be delayed until the next election cycle. The arch will remain a flashpoint for the debate over Trump’s legacy and the use of
Read Full Story at The Hill →


